危機處理是國際關係領域較為新穎的議題，亦具有跨學科性質，在企業管理及國際關係領域較常出現。因此危機處理所形成的理論較為鬆散且多依附在國際關係的三大學派之下，直到布列查提出危機整合模型後，危機處理才逐漸具備系統性的研究成果。在2011年的釣魚台爭端中，民族主義成為三方危機處理上的獨立變項，由於民族主義的跨層次特性，需要以跨層次分析架構先釐清民族主義在中日台三國危機處理中的角色與影響。 本文擬以2011年的釣魚台爭端為例，借用危機整合模型與跨層次分析架構，針對中日台三方的危機處理能力做比較，並試圖釐清三方的危機處理模式何者較優，為危機處理研究提供新的實證上案例分析。 Crisis management is a relatively new and interdisciplinary field of international relations issues, and appearing more often in the field of business management and international relations. Therefore the theories of Crisis management are more loosely and often attached itself to the dominant international relations schools until Michael Brecher pointed out Unified Model Crisis. Nationalism had become the independence variable of crisis management in the 2011 Diaoyutai debate. Due to the character of cross level of nationalism, it would be important to clarify the role of nationalism in the process of crisis management in the three countries. The main purpose of the thesis is to compare the capacity of crisis management in China, Japan and R.O.C through Unified Model Crisis and Cross level analysis. And the thesis also seeks to clarify which crisis management model is better in this case, providing new evidence on the case studies of crisis management research.
