南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/17471
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 18278/19583 (93%)
造访人次 : 1091511      在线人数 : 713
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/17471


    题名: 佛光山人間佛教的社會實踐─兼論與原始佛教之關涉
    其它题名: The Study of the Social Practice of Fo Guang Shan's Humanistic Buddhism and its relationship with Early Buddhism
    作者: 蔡麗芬
    Tsai, Li-fen
    貢獻者: 宗教學研究所
    陳美華
    Meei-hwa Chern
    关键词: 宗教市場理論;原始佛教;社會實踐;人間佛教;佛光山
    Religious Economy Model;Early Buddhism;Social Practice;Humanistic Buddhism;Fo Guang Shan
    日期: 2013
    上传时间: 2014-12-23 14:29:29 (UTC+8)
    摘要:   本研究選擇佛光山人間佛教的社會實踐為研究對象,其以現代化與生活化的入世作為為實踐框架,此與原始佛教出世解脫的實踐方式,彼此之間的關涉,是本研究進行考掘的論題。同時本研究以當代社會學之宗教市場理論的觀點來詮釋佛光山人間佛教的社會實踐。  研究發現,佛光山人間佛教與原始佛教二者的產生,都與當時代的政經等社會背景之變化有關。在修行目標及弘法方面,原始佛教強調內修的修證,以出世解脫達至涅槃為目標,以出家僧侶為弘法的主體。佛光山人間佛教強調佛法的社會實踐,主張「僧信平等化」,在家信眾也可以積極參與種種宗教活動及弘法佈教。雖然二者都立基於實踐哲學之立場,佛光山人間佛教所強調的是現世人間倫理性生活之提升,原始佛教所重視的是超越面的自我超拔,也就是出離輪迴的解脫。同時也發現入世性的宗教組織之修行者,以出世的精神做入世的事業,如何安頓其生活實踐的超越性及出世解脫的目標,仍面對著神聖性與世俗性的諍論。  本文以宗教市場理論詮釋佛光山人間佛教的社會實踐,發現經由市場機制的運用,宗教教義、宗教服務、宗教活動與世俗元素結合,並透過合於宗教質素的管道來經營信徒或潛在信徒,對於宗教組織的發展有相當的關連性。宗教市場理論的立論,讓我們認識宗教組織的作用,也理解到宗教市場理論分析宗教組織作為宗教與現代性關係的實質場域之詮釋基礎。
      This research selected the social practice of Fo Guang Shan’s Humanistic Buddhism as the study subject. It examined the relationship between its "going into the society" practice framework of modernization and daily-living and the transcendental liberation practice of the Early Buddhism. In addition, this study used the contemporary sociology theory of Religious Economy Model to analyze the social practice of Fo Guang Shan’s Humanistic Buddhism.  Results revealed that the development of Fo Guang Shan’s Humanistic Buddhism and the Early Buddhism were both influenced by the political, economic, and social factors at their times. Early Buddhism emphasized on the doctrine of liberation through monastic life and ultimately attained Nirvana through monastic life outside of the society. It considered the monastics as the core in promoting the Dharma. On the other hand, Fo Guang Shan’s Humanistic Buddhism emphasized on the social practice of the Dharma and advocated the equality of the Sangha and lay practitioners. The lay practitioners can participate in the religious activities and the propagation of Dharma similar to the monastics. Although both groups set their foundation on the philosophy of practice, Fo Guang Shan Monastic emphasized the promotion of ethics in secular life, while Early Buddhism stressed the liberation of transmigration through the realization of non-self. In addition, this study also found that the "going into the society" monastics, while they were engaging in secular matters with a sacred spirit, and spiritual supremacy, with the aim of transcendental liberation, they still had to face with the critics about sacred and secular arguments.  The present study used theories of Religious Economy Model to analyze the social practice of Fo Guang Shan’s Humanistic Buddhism. It found that through the use of market mechanisms, that is, religious doctrines, religious services, and religious activities combined with secular elements, and that through the use of religious channel to manage believers and potential believers were highly related to the development of religious organizations. The theory of Religious Economy Model allowed us to understand the functions of religious organizations and to understand relationship between the practice of religious organizations and modernization.
    显示于类别:[宗教學研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    101NHU05183020-001.pdf3782KbAdobe PDF1379检视/开启
    index.html0KbHTML485检视/开启


    在NHUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈