在19世紀國際貿易興盛後，專利權的保護包括國內法制訂與國際條約之締結漸漸受到重視，使得經濟繁榮發展與工業技術進步，專利法更有一套完善措施。專利權本身賦予排他專利性之無體產權，因此一向被視為最具獨占性質之實證法定化之產物。WTO會員國多方受到TRIPS協定的規範、國內法優於國際法的因素，與國際法的衝突必然產生，至於開發中國家或已開發中國家更無法避免專利權保護。本篇也以爭端機制以飛利浦公司如何尋求歐盟執委會的協助以及上訴WTO之談判為例子。 Since the international trade has been flourishing in the 19th century the protection of intellectual property right regarding not only internal regulations but international ones seems getting more important. What mentioned before is making progress on the industrial and economical development. Thanks to progress on the industrial and economical development patent law is getting complemented nowadays. Franchise itself gives no exclusive patent of the body of property rights, has long been regarded as the most exclusive of the nature the products empirical legal. The factors in which Member States of the WTO are under the control of the TRIPS Agreement and domestic law is superior to international law lead inevitably to conflict of international law. Furthermore, the developed countries or under-developed ones can’t get rid of the protection of patent rights. Consequently, the thesis focuses mainly on the dispute mechanism, and on case study of Philips’s appeal to the European Commission, even to the WTO.
