南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/18250
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18278/19583 (93%)
Visitors : 942345      Online Users : 1500
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/18250


    Title: 電子書閱讀行為分析
    Other Titles: Reading Pattern with e-book
    Authors: 沈歆婷
    Shin, Hsin-ting
    Contributors: 出版與文化事業管理研究所
    楊聰仁
    Tsung -jen, Yang
    Keywords: 閱讀行為;閱讀;數位出版;電子書閱讀器;電子書
    reading;reading behavior;digital publishing;e-reader;e-book
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2015-01-19 14:32:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   電子書閱讀器產品的發展日新月異,使用電子書閱讀器進行數位閱讀已是普遍現象,本研究針對學生族群使用電子書閱讀器的閱讀行為進行研究,對於學生使用電子書閱讀器進行閱讀時的閱讀速度、閱讀理解能力以及使用滿意度進行探討。   本研究以學生為主要研究對象,研究使用電子書閱讀器閱讀以及使用紙本書閱讀時,閱讀者的閱讀速度以及理解力是否會有差異。實驗分為兩個部分,第一部份為數位閱讀的使用行為研究,將收集到的相關文獻綜合整理後,設計一份前置問卷,藉由問卷整理出消費者所希望閱讀的內容。第二部分為實驗,受試者共30人,採隨機抽樣,將受試者分為二組,一組為使用電子書閱讀器,人數為15人;一組為使用紙本書閱讀組,人數為15人,閱讀的內容為前置作業所統整出的結果,讓受試者在實際操作後填寫滿意度表格及與內容相關問卷,再從所收集到的數據加以整理統計。   本研究結果發現: 1.使用電子書閱讀器與紙本進行閱讀的閱讀速度在性別上並沒有顯著的差異。2.使用電子書閱讀器或紙本書進行閱讀的閱讀理解上沒有顯著的差異。3.閱讀紙本書在閱讀容易度而言有顯著的差異。4. 閱讀理解力在性別上沒有顯著的差異。
      There are a variety of e-readers in the market, since the e-reader becomes the popular reading device. The purpose of this study aims to explore the behavior of students using e-reader, to investigate the reading speed, reading comprehension, and the satisfaction when using e-reader to read.   This study adopts the method of semi-experiment. The subjects of this study are the college students and the graduate students. There are 30 subjects divided into two groups-e-reader and paper. Each group is asked to read some content first. Then, collect the reading period time and implement the comprehension test. They are also asked to complete the satisfaction questionnaire.   The follows are the main conclusion of this study:  1. Gender is not the main factor of reading speed. 2. Reading by e-reader or by paper dose not cause the major differences on the reading comprehension. 3. Reading by paper is more ease. 4. Gender is not the main factor of reading comprehension.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Cultural & Creative Enterprise Management] Disserations and Theses(Institute of Publishing & Cultural Enterprise Management Studies)

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    099NHU05663019-001.pdf2902KbAdobe PDF16View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML321View/Open


    All items in NHUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback