論《四庫全書總目提要》對夢窗詞之接受

南華大學機構典藏系統 > 本校期刊 > 文學新鑰 > Item 987654321/18735

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/18735

題名:	論《四庫全書總目提要》對夢窗詞之接受
其他題名:	Study on the Acceptance of Meng Chuang's Ci in Catalogue Summary of Siku Quanshu
作者:	普義南 Pu, Yin-An
貢獻者:	淡江大學中文系 Department of Chinese,Tamkang University
關鍵詞:	接受;吳文英;夢窗詞;四庫全書總目提要;毛晉;李商隱 Acceptance;Wenying Wu;Meng Chuang's Ci;the Catalogue Summary of Si Ku Quan Shu;Jin Mao;Shangyin Li
日期:	2013-06-01
上傳時間:	2015-02-24 16:20:20 (UTC+8)
出版者:	南華大學文學系
摘要:	夢窗詞歷經元明時期三百年的沉寂，至明末毛晉以家藏夢窗詞刻之，加以《古今詞統》的大量選入，始重現於世人眼前。清朝初年，以朝廷為主導的詞學重大編修事業，諸如《御製選歷代詩餘》、《欽定詞譜》大量選錄、引用夢窗詞，對於夢窗詞的經典化與細校，影響甚深。然而直到《四庫全書總目提要》，始見資料蒐羅外，官方立場對夢窗詞比較全面性的評述。其內容大致有四：一是對《夢窗甲乙稿》、《夢窗丙丁稿》成書過程提出質疑，舉證駁斥毛晉以天干編年的說法；二是人品評騭方面，批評夢窗晚年贈詞權臣賈似道之舉；三是詞作風格方面，提出「詞家之有文英，亦如詩家之有李商隱也」的說法；四是詞文校訂，不注出處，實際上大量襲用萬樹《詞律》對夢窗詞的校律意見。本論文即針對《四庫全書總目提要》夢窗詞的評述內容，剖析其批評立場與論據，兼及對夢窗詞的接受影響。 Meng Chuang’s Ci remained unknown in Yuan Dynasty and Ming Dynasty for three hundred years. Until the end of Ming Dynasty, Jin Mao engraved the Meng Chuang’s Ci which was collected by his family, and in addition, owing to the large collection of Meng Chuang Ci by Gu Jin Ci Tong, it reappeared in the world. In early Qing Dynasty, the significant compilations of poetry which were dominated by the court, such as Yu Zhi Li Dai Shi Yu(Verses of Each Dynasty) and Qin Ding Ci Pu(Index to the imperial registeroftzu prosody) excerpted a lot of of Meng Chuang Ci, which had significant impact on the classics and the careful proofreading of Meng Chuang’s Ci.However, until the Catalogue Summary of Siku Quanshu, more complete commentary on Meng Chuang’s Ci from the authority’s stance was published besides the collection of materials. The commentary included four aspects: 1. Put forward questions regarding the procedure of publishing Meng Chuang Jia Yi Gaoand Meng Chuang Bing Ding Gao, arguing the viewpoint of Jin Mao with presented evidence that the chronology was based on heavenly stems; 2. Assessing the personality of Meng Chuang, criticizing him for giving his poems to powerful ourtier, Sidao Jia, when he was aged; 3. Regarding the style of his poetry, it advocated that Wenying was a writer of Ci, which was akin to Shangying Li being a writer of poems; 4. As for the proofreading, reference resources were not mentioned. It actually followed the comments of Ci Lu by Shu Wan on Meng Chuang’s Ci.This study aimed at the comments of the Catalogue Summary of Siku Quanshu on Meng Chuang’s Ci and explored its critical stance and argument as well as the impact of the acceptance of Meng Chuang’s Ci.
關聯:	文學新鑰 17期
顯示於類別:	[文學系] 文學新鑰 [本校期刊] 文學新鑰

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
4023001707.pdf		2387Kb	Adobe PDF	539	檢視/開啟
index.html		0Kb	HTML	954	檢視/開啟

在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

TAIR相關文章

資料載入中.....