南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/18933
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18278/19583 (93%)
Visitors : 952650      Online Users : 653
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    NHUIR > The Journals of Nanhua University  > Aletheia >  Item 987654321/18933


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/18933


    Title: 牟宗三先生與康德哲學之摩盪：一條思想發展的線索
    Other Titles: The Philosophical Engagement of Mou Zongsan and Kant: A Historical Thread
    Authors: 李淳玲
    Esther, C.Su
    Contributors: 中國哲學與文化研究基金會
    Foundation for the Study of Chinese Philosophy and Culture (FSCPC)
    Keywords: 知性的邏輯性格;知性的存有論性格;自我坎陷;識心之執;智的直覺
    logical character of the Understanding;ontological character of the Understanding;self-negation;the attachment of the consciousness;and the intellectual intuition
    Date: 2014-07-01
    Issue Date: 2015-03-05 09:39:32 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 南華大學生死學系哲學與生命教育
    Abstract: 本文試圖從七個段落闡述牟宗三先生與康德哲學的摩盪：(1) 前言；(2) 本於他的《五十自述》表述他從「先驗辯證論」解讀康德哲學的進路；(3) 依他的《認識心之批判》闡釋他早年僅專注康德知性邏輯性格之失誤；(4) 從他《認識心之批判》之〈重印誌言〉，表述牟先生自認早期對康德知性存有論性格之不解；(5) 從《現象與物自身》指出牟先生透過黑格爾式的辯證「自我坎陷」，並藉佛教之「識心之執」展開康德之「知性的存有論性格」；(6) 綜述牟先生從「德行底優先性」，以「無執的存有論」為主軸消化康德的批判哲學；(7) 指出牟先生哲學一些未決的問題。
    This paper attempts to sketch in seven sections Mou Zongsan’s philosophical development in terms of his unusual ways of engaging Kant’s philosophy： (1) preliminary remarks, (2) his approaching Kant’s first Critique from the Transcendental Dialectic, (3) his approaching Kant’s Understanding only from its logical character in his early philosophical development, (4) his later recognition of the ontological character of Kant’s Understanding, (5) his establishing Kant’s ontological character of the Understanding with the Hegelian-like concept of “self-negation” and the Buddhist concept of “attachment of the consciousness,” (6) his assimilation of Kant’s critical philosophy by establishing the “ontology of non-attachment” with the affirmation of human intellectual intuition, and (7) some remaining issues in Mou’s own critical philosophy.
    Relation: 揭諦
    27期
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Life-and-Death Studies] Aletheia
    [The Journals of Nanhua University ] Aletheia

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    4012002701.pdf908KbAdobe PDF1078View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML553View/Open


    All items in NHUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback