公私立動物收容所經營管理

NHUIR > College of Management > Department of Business Administration, Master/Ph.D Program in Management Sciences > Disserations and Theses(M. A. Program in Nonprofit Organization Management) > Item 987654321/20321

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/20321

Title:	公私立動物收容所經營管理
Other Titles:	Management of Public and Private Animal Shelters
Authors:	羅承業 Lo, Chen-yeh
Contributors:	非營利事業管理研究所王振軒 Chen-shiuan Wang
Keywords:	終養動物收容所;流浪犬;動物收容所 animal shelters;stray dogs;no-kill animal shelters
Date:	2008
Issue Date:	2015-04-20 14:20:46 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	在進入求新求變高度經濟成長時代，人們喜新厭舊，追求時髦流行，疏離感日重，此些態度均表現在生活行為上。家中的愛犬，喜歡的時候視之如寶捧上天；厭了不合意，就任意隨性的丟棄牠們。這些隨意棄養的流浪犬，造成社會很大的問題。　　　　流浪犬在社會上造成交通安全、疾病傳染、及環境衛生等相關問題。社會上對於流浪狗的處置爭議不斷；而流浪犬在動物收容所的待遇亦受到民眾及動保團體的重視。公私立動物收容所人力與經費拮据，並在經營管理上需面對許多的難題:由於民意高漲，民眾對公立動物收容所要求甚高，稍有差錯就須面臨民眾的指責及動保團體的抗議；而民間私立動物收容所在面臨有限的資源及國人傳統不殺生觀念下，又要講求動物福利，經營起來格外艱辛。此間因素成為本文探討公私立動物收容所經營管理的研究動機。　　　　本研究比較兩公私立動物收容所在有限的人力及經費下的經營管理。在公立動物收容所方面，本研究以台南市動物防疫所之「台南市流浪動物中途之家」作為研究樣本。該中心在侷限的人力與經費下，向外發展結合民間愛心社團及動保團體，舉辦多項認養宣導活動，在6年內共有7506隻流浪犬受到認領養進而維持該機構的營運效率。而私立動物收容所方面則以中華民國保護動物協會八里保育場為樣本。保育場為終養動物收容所(no-kill animal shelter)。在面對人力與經費的壓力下，自90年中起管理作業進入電腦化階段，落實場內犬隻植入晶片並拍照建立犬籍口卡，登錄其特徵、性格、健康狀況、預防注射、醫療等紀錄。保育場並嚴格要求每位管理員除做場地清潔與犬隻飼餵外，隨時掌握自己管理區域隻犬隻數目、性格、行為等，並列入工作績效考評項目。藉由此電子化管理系統，該中心的營運效率得以大幅提升，反映在場內還境的改善及收容動物生活品質的增進。該場收容動物死亡率由93年的3.09%下降至96年的0.98％，讓每一位捐款人的善心奉獻都能達到最有效率的運用。　　With growing economy, discretionary income increases. As their finances improve, individuals are able to replace possessions more frequently. This practice extends to pet ownership. Owners tend to abandon their pets after the feeling of novelty worn off, which creates considerable issues to the society.　　　　Stray dogs have caused societal issues in many aspects including traffic safety concerns, epidemic control, and environmental sanitation. Debate surrounding how to handle these animals has created many controversies. Much attention from the general public as well as animal rights groups has been focused on the treatment received by stray dogs in animal shelters. While both public and private animal shelters have limited access to funding and resources, there are additional pressures specific to the nature of each organization. Public sectors receive high visibility and are under considerable public scrutiny whereas private animal shelters, with the same responsibilities, are subjected to the traditional Buddhist value of no-killing and are prevented from euthanizing high-risk animals. These challenges are the motives behind this study in the management of public and private animal shelters.　　　　This study compares the management models of public and private animal shelters with limited funding and resources. The sample for public sectors was Animal Sheltering Home of Tainan City. To alleviate financial and staffing stress, this institute collaborates with other charity organizations and animal rights groups to encourage adoption and promote animal sponsorship. Through these arrangements, the Animal Sheltering Home has been able to facilitate a combination of adoptions and sponsorships for 7, 506 dogs within 6 years. The collaborative relationships help the institute with animal transition and placement thereby increasing the efficiency of the entity. Bali Animal Shelter, affiliated with Animal Protection Association of R.O.C., was a no-kill animal shelter utilized as the sample for private sectors. Facing short funding and staffing, the Bali Animal Shelter elected to leverage technology in an effort to reduce cost. By implanting identification chips into each dog, they have been able to manage their animal population using a software managed tracking system since 2001. Through periodic performance review, the shelter is able to ensure that personnel are aware of the current animal population and behavior in their responsible area. The effectiveness of the system is reflected through the improvement of the environment as well as the enhancement of the animals’ quality of life. For example, the animal decease rate has decreased from 3.09% in 2004 to 0.98% in 2007, which shows the best use of every donation.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Business Administration, Master/Ph.D Program in Management Sciences] Disserations and Theses(M. A. Program in Nonprofit Organization Management)

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
096NHU05698032-001.pdf		1560Kb	Adobe PDF	55	View/Open
index.html		0Kb	HTML	303	View/Open

Loading...