本研究旨在探討台中縣九二一震災國中校園重建景觀，其目的有三： 一、探討政府及民間重建景觀造形的特色。二、探討學生對校園景觀的觀點。三、藉由問卷、訪談方式分析重建後校園景觀，提供後續學校校園重建與教學互動的參考。經研究發現茲分述如下：一、重建學校因認養單位呈現不同風格。二、新舊校舍因建築時代不同反映出不同造形。三、學生對校園景觀觀點：依全部重建與部分重建、政府規劃與民間認養有所差異。四、重建相關人員觀點：（一）校園景觀呈現與傳統融合、多元化的空間。（二）校園的表演和作品展示、休閒環境，改變教與學的方式。（三）學校為社區教學中心和運動的場所。（四）政府規劃程序較繁瑣，重建理念能落實。慈濟認養大致能配合學校，但實用要求與規劃有所差距。五、由學生問卷中發現三項問題：（一）全部重建學校學生對校園內的植物中有很許多生物同意比例比部分重建學校低。因重建後學校植物尚未長大，或移植不久無法馬上吸引昆蟲與鳥類？部分重建學校是否因校園內植物生態環境已確立，重建時保留原有大樹，原有生物不會因重建而減少？（二）全部重建學校學生對休閒空間會干擾到教室上課同意比例，比部分重建學校高，是否因休閒空間太多、或者休閒空間的設置與教室距離太近等原因？部分重建學校是否因習慣性使然或休閒空間規劃良好？（三）政府規劃學校學生對學校與社區環境的造形很搭配同意比例，比民間認養學校高。民間認養單位設計是否因規劃理想，在造形上與社區環境的搭配上較不協調？六、對後續研究的建議：（一）研究對象可依全部重建或部分重建單項做深入研究；以政府重建或民間認養單項比較。（二）研究對象可單獨以慈濟認養學校做深入探討。（三）研究者可依問卷六大項題目中單獨某一項做微觀研究。 The theme of this research focuses on reconstruction school campus in Taichung County after the 921 earthquake. There are three main purposes : I、Investigating the characteristic of landscape formation reconstructed by the government and the civilian.II、Investigating students’ point of view to campus landscape.III、Offering some references for subsequent campus reconstruction and interaction between teaching and learning by means of analyzing the questionnaire and interview about the campus landscape after the reconstruction.The following results are concluded :I、Presenting different styles due to different sponsor units.II、Appearing different forms due to different building periods of the old and new school buildings.III、Points of view of the students to the campus : the differences depend on whether they are reconstructed wholly and partly; government and civilian sponsoredIV、 Points of view of the related staff of reconstruction :（I）Campus landscape presents a blending with tradition ; variety space.（II）Performace in the campus, works display, recreation environment, reform the method of teaching and learning.（III）School is the place for community teaching center and sports（IV）The procedure is more complicated, but the concept is fulfilled well. General agreement between sponsor Tsu-Ji Organization, but some differences exist in practical demand and planning.V、Three questions are founded from students’ questionnaires :（I）The ratio of agreeing with the amount of living creatures in campus plants in wholly reconstructed school is lower than that is partly reconstructed. Are the plants not grown enough or can’t shortly replanted plants attract bugs and birds? （II）The ratio of agreeing with the disturbance of the recreation space equipment in wholly reconstructed school is higher than that is partly reconstructed. Maybe there is too much space, or the equipment is too close to the classroom. In partly reconstructed school, maybe people get used to it or better designed.（III）The ratio of agreeing with the form matching in building the school and community environment in school sponsored by the government is higher than that is sponsored by civilians. Maybe that’s because it is too idealized to match with the community environment in style.VI、Suggestions to the continuing research:（I）Research objects can be deeply studied according to the single item of wholly reconstructed or partly reconstructed.（II）Research objects can be deeply studied simply on the school sponsored by Tsu-Ji Organization.（III）Researcher can do micro study on certain item from the six questions on the questionnaires.
