資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/21435
|
| 題名: | 普京政府亞太政策之研究 |
| 其他題名: | Studies on Putin's Policies toward Asia-pacific |
| 作者: | 謝東龍
Ce, Dong-long |
| 貢獻者: | 歐洲研究所
洪茂雄
Mao-hsiung Hung |
| 關鍵詞: | 亞太政策;普京;俄羅斯
Russia;Asia-pacific;Putin |
| 日期: | 2003 |
| 上傳時間: | 2015-06-04 11:33:38 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | Asia-Pacific also holds enormous strategic significance for Russia. It remains an area of immense concentration of military power, including many of the largest armies in the world. There are a number of unsettled territorial and ethno-religious conflicts which have the potential to cause, or are already causing, instability in the entire region. It should be noted that Russia itself is a party to some unresolved territorial disputes such as the Kuril dispute. The Russian leadership has repeatedly emphasized that Russia had always been a Eurasian country, with regard not only to its territory but also its interests, policies, and even psychology. It is commonplace to ascertain that the Asia-Pacific region (APR) is of vital and growing concern to Russia. A number of particular Russian economic, political and strategic interests can be highlighted. Moscow is very interested in developing the Russian Far East through co-operation with the neighboring countries (albeit the federal center often simply eliminated local problems). The main problem for Moscow with regards to the region is staying engaged and remaining an important player in the future development of Asia-Pacific. This has been made difficult for two reasons. Firstly, Russian military power has been dramatically reduced in the area. Russia simply can no longer afford to maintain the same level of military presence in the region as it did with the Soviet Union. Secondly, because of the dire economic conditions that now prevail in Russia, it currently has little to offer other Far Eastern countries and this being at the very time that economic strength has become the manifestation of a country’s power and significance. Along with the internal major threats to Russia's security, the document identifies a number of dangers stemming from the international dynamics. The doctrine highlights the following sources of external threat: territorial claims; attempts of foreign countries to use Russia's domestic problems for weakening its international positions or challenging its territorial integrity. External challenges, however, are of less significance than internal threats.Present-day Russian security thinking does not limit the notion of security only to strategic-military issues (‘hard’ security). Rather, it acknowledges that in the contemporary world ‘soft’ security may matter more than security in traditional sense. As Russia aims at creating favorable conditions for developing its foreign economic relations with the countries of the region and eliminating any barriers to such a co-operation. Moscow pushes ASEAN and Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum (APEC) to promote free trade principles in the APR. Moscow was pleased with the APEC’s decision to admit Russia as a full-fledged member in November 1998. Russian leadership tries both to encourage the region’s foreign economic relations and keep them under its control. Moscow becomes especially nervous when the Far Eastern provinces demonstrate any signs of separatism. Present-day Russian security thinking does not limit the notion of security only to strategic-military issues (‘hard’ security). Rather, it acknowledges that in the contemporary world ‘soft’ security may matter more than security in traditional sense. The Asia-Pacific countries (including Russia) are facing new economic challenges such as uneven development, depletion of non-renewable natural resources, trade wars, competition for markets and sources of raw materials, environmental degradation, food shortages and so on. Moscow repeatedly emphasised that it considered protection of Russia’s economic interests in Asia-Pacific as an important foreign policy objective. Despite the seeming number of threats, most of Russian politicians, military and analysts assess the above mentioned challenges optimistically rather than pessimistically. They view Asia-Pacific as a region that really is not burdened with major security threats. These threats mainly originate from the ‘soft’ rather than from the ‘hard’ security domain. Such threats could be successfully met by developing economic and humanitarian co-operation and creating interdependency mechanism rather than by traditional means such as military build-up or alliance-formation. |
| 顯示於類別: | [國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班)] 博碩士論文-歐洲研究碩士班
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 091NHU05481003-001.pdf | | 3172Kb | Adobe PDF | 41 | 檢視/開啟 | | index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 213 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
