| 摘要: | 本論文研究乃以榮格的「占星命盤」為實踐媒介，來探討榮格理論核心的「積極想像」與「靈性再生」概念。研究者關懷的重心是：「存在的既定事實」（包括人們在世的處境、侷限、可能性）、「心靈的本質與結構」、「靈性再生」和「個體化過程」的深層義涵。研究目的在於：（一）、以宏觀的角度，詮釋「積極想像」與「靈性再生」原理（二）、通過「積極想像」實踐途徑之一的「占星學」，理解並析論榮格的「靈性再生」概念（三）、以榮格的「個體化過程」為例，探討理論與其人之結合關係，並反思榮格理論的實踐性問題。相關於研究前理解中，所謂的「積極想像」是一種”主動的夢”之實踐原理與方法，它也是一種貫穿榮格理論的心理治療技術。故本研究以分析心理學為研究取向，並採質性的文史哲研究法為探討進路，即：（一）、文獻研究法－－1、觀點整理與釐清2、文獻探討與詮釋；（二）、哲學分析法（涉及語言哲學與分析哲學範疇）；（三）、理論與實踐雙軌進行的研究方式。至於鋪陳架構，在通過知識論問題的釐清之後，接著以「榮格的個體化過程」為例，探討「積極想像」與「靈性再生」概念的諸多涵義。析論中的「象徵分析法」，指涉透過實踐媒介所獲得的心靈意象材料，在「超越功能」的自主作用下，針對象徵意義的「神話原型」主題進行「放大」、「綜合」與「建構」的解析工作。研究的操作工具因慮及榮格本身具備的占星學素養，及研究過程詮釋「同時性原則」的必要性，加上其女兒（占星家）提供的榮格之星盤資料。故，選擇占星盤做為「積極想像」冥想法之媒介橋樑，並以榮格的夢、幻覺、記憶等文獻資料做為交相證成的「互文性」文本。簡言之，這是一個經由榮格的「命盤」文本及其「存在形式」的「生活經驗」文本，運用象徵分析的技術，在「神話原型」主題的脈絡下，以廣義的榮格式現象學方法，探討榮格如何自「積極想像」原理中達到「靈性再生」目的之「個體化過程」的研究。
This treatise tries, by putting Jung’s Natal Chart into practice as a medium, to explore the main theme of Jung’s theory in “active imagination” and “spiritual rebirth”. The key point that the researcher concerns is the connotation of：“The being’s fixed facts”（including man’s position、confinement and possibility in the world）,“mental quality and structure”, “spiritual rebirth” and “the process of individuation.” The purpose lies in（1）the principles and methods of “active imagination,”（2）trying to explore Jung’s concept in “spiritual rebirth” through one of the practical processes of “active imagination”－astrology and（3）by taking Jung’s “the process of individuation.” as an example, to expound Jung’s theory in practical pragmatic problem.With regard to the above understanding, we know the so-called “active imagination” is a pragmatic principle and method of “active dream；” in other words, this is also a technology of psychotherapy, penetrating Jung’s theory. This treatise tries to study by patterning after analytical psychology and to adopt the methodology of literature, history and philosophy as a way of study. That is：（1）The methodology of literary records－1.the integration and regulation of viewpoints and 2.the exploration and explanation of literary records；（2）philosophical analysis （dabbling in the sphere of linguistic philosophy and analytical philosophy）and（3）the method of study through both theory and pragmatism. As to the frame of detailed statement, having regulated the problem through epistemology, I try to, by taking Jung’s “the process of individuation.” as an example, discuss the concepts and connotation of “active dream” and “spiritual rebirth”.In “symbolic analysis,” I mean to obtain the materials of spiritual image through the pragmatic medium in the active analysis of “transcendental function,” aiming at the theme of the symbolic meaning of archetype of mythology, to proceed with the analysis of “amplification,” “synthetic method” and “constructive method.” |
