資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/22215
|
| 題名: | 我國代理孕母政策形成之發展與爭議 |
| 其他題名: | The Development and Dispute of the Surrogate Motherhood Policy Formation in Taiwan |
| 作者: | 黃媺綾
Huang, Mei-ling |
| 貢獻者: | 公共行政與政策研究所
彭安麗
An-li Peng |
| 關鍵詞: | 代理孕母;政策形成;政策規劃;參與者;人工生殖
policy formulation;artificial reproduction;surrogate motherhood;actor;policy formation |
| 日期: | 2006 |
| 上傳時間: | 2015-08-03 13:46:56 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 本文首先說明代理孕母政策形成的原因、政策問題形成過程 (包括代理孕母問題的發生、提出、接納與政策認定)、代理孕母政策規劃的過程，並介紹政策規劃參與者及其立場，包括行政機關、立法機關、利益團體、大眾傳播媒體、公民。再探討各個參與者間的互動情形，及其對代理孕母政策的影響。其次，從倫理層面、宗教層面、法律層面、女性主義層面探討代理孕母政策所引起的爭議。因為縱使來自各層面的反對聲浪不斷，阻礙代理孕母政策的合法化，但唯有了解這些爭議，才能在所有利益中取得平衡，將傷害減至最低，進而加速代理孕母的立法。同時介紹英國1985年「代孕安排法」、2003年修正之「人類生殖與胚胎研究法」、美國1988年「代孕法範本」草案、1988年「人工協助生殖技術所生子女法律地位統一法」、2002年修正之「統一親子地位法」、及香港2002年修正之「人類生殖科技條例」、2000年修正之「父母與子女條例」。並透過對外國立法規範的分析、比較與歸納、演繹出適合我國特有的國情和社會需要的代理孕母政策。最後，綜合所有代理孕母政策形成過程中的爭議，在考量委託夫妻、代理孕母、依代孕契約所生子女三方利益下，提出本文之結論與政策建議，作為日後立法之參考。
First, the article explains the cause of the surrogate motherhood policy formation, the process of the surrogate motherhood policy formation (including how the problems of the surrogate motherhood is to occur, present, accept and identify) and the process of the surrogate motherhood policy formulation and introduces the surrogate motherhood policy formulation actors as well as their point of views in the surrogate motherhood policy formulation. The actors include administrative organizations, legislatures, interest groups, mass media and citizens. Then the article discusses the interaction of each actor and the influence to the surrogate motherhood policy in their interaction. Second, the article discusses about the dispute caused by the surrogate motherhood policy from ethics aspect, religion aspect, law aspect and feminism aspect. The continuing objections bring about from different aspects and these obstacles defer the surrogate motherhood to be legalized, however, only to understand the essential problems can get the best profit between each other and moreover reduce the damage to procure the legality of surrogate motherhood. Third, the article introduces Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 and Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2003 of the United Kingdom, Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act 1985, The Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act 1988 and Uniform Parentage Act 2002 of the United States and Human Reproductive Technology Ordinance 2002 and Parent and Child Ordinance 2000 of Hong Kong. In order to conclude a surrogate motherhood regulation, which is fitting the needs of the nation and society, the article analyzes, compares, generalizes, and syllogizes foreign legislations. At last, the article synthesizes all the dispute in the process of the surrogate motherhood policy formation. To consider the tripartite interests of commissioning couple, surrogate motherhood and children born of a surrogacy agreement, the conclusions and policy recommendations are proposed as the reference that will be legislated in the future. |
| 顯示於類別: | [國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班)] 博碩士論文-公共政策研究碩士班
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 094NHU05054008-001.pdf | | 1105Kb | Adobe PDF | 4421 | 檢視/開啟 | | index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 249 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
