本文旨在補足目前劉蕺山學術研究中的一個空白──《人譜雜記》研究上的闕如。首先，說明為何一般學者會忽略《人譜雜記》，因為這本書只是一些古人言行紀錄。接著，說明《人譜雜記》在道德實踐上的重要性，說明不可忽略此書，於是，如何找到一個詮釋方法，來面對一般學者認為沒有哲學意義的《人譜雜記》便是首要問題。本文提出「證量解經」的詮釋途徑來處理這個忽略現象，這樣，在道德實踐上，《人譜雜記》便可發揮她引導、印證與勘驗生命現象的作用了。 The study of Liu Ji-Shan is very popular. But in the well liked situation, Ran Pu Za Ji (《人譜雜記》) is always ignored. This paper wants to make up a deficiency to the shortcoming. First,I consider the form of Ran Pu Za Ji and analyse the reasons that it is always ignored. Then I feel like to compare Ran Pu Za Ji and Ran Pu Lei Ji(人譜類記)）. According to my reading about the two books, Ran Pu Lei Ji is not correct. Third, I investigate the interpretive approaches of Liu Ji-Shan's Ran Pu Za Ji. We will find that it is suitable to to regard Ran Pu Za Ji. as a legal case of realizing Tao. So we decide that the properly interpretive approach is interpreting classics by the measure of pratically enlightening. Next, I confer the functions of Ran Pu Za Ji in the process of moral practice. It has the effects－－the guiding beforehand, keeping and detecting on the instant ,and mutual proof afterwards. On the conclusion, I will show that Ran Pu is important in the progress of moral practice, and Ran Pu Za Ji is also.
