宋初士風承襲晚唐五代餘風，缺乏道德節義觀念，有識之士如柳開等人標舉韓愈「道統」以端正士風。且因為韓愈「文」與「道」的關係密切，自然受到重視，同時，韓愈的詩歌也被少數文人視為廣義的「韓文」，並稍受重視。此為「韓愈」的詩透過「文」而與「道」產生初步的繫連。接著宋人討論韓詩都集中在「以文為詩」議題的正反面論述，並引發不同層面的論爭，這些論爭不但無法撼搖韓愈詩歌的地位，反而擴大韓詩的影響層面。歸其原因，乃是廣義「韓詩」與「道」的內在價值有其密不可分的關係。本文試圖從「以文為詩」中的文（形式）與道的關係，擴展到「以道入詩」的發展，透過「道」的詮釋權之歸屬，考察韓愈詩歌在有宋 The early Song dynasty intellectuals had inherited the literature style of Tang Dynasty and Five Dynasties and Ten States－lacked Moral righteousness. Some men of the foresight (such as Liu-Kai …etc.) started to take concept－resuming Confucianism－correcting the general likes and dislike in that time. Owing to Han Yu’s Wen (taking the style of ancient prose as the poem ) and the Dao (resuming Confucianism ) had the close relationship in the style of literature , so people paid much attention to it. At the same time, Han Yu’s poem was taken by a few scholars as generalized trend of Han’s style literature and thought highly of it. This was the initial step of his poem to connect between Wen（文） and the Dao（道）in literature. Then people in Song Dynasty were focused on the issue of the taking the style of ancient prose as the poem to do positive and negative discussion. And it surely aroused all aspects of scholars’s debate at that time. However, it couldn’t influence the position of Han Yu’s literature achievement. On the country, his poem had widely recognized by the people and caused a trend. The main reason was that Han Yu’s poem and Dao (resuming Confucianism) had a close and inseparable intrinsic value. This essay is trying to inspect the acceptance of Han Yu’s poem in Song Dynasty through the relationship of the article style and Dao (resuming Confucianism) ,and the development of taking Dao as the poem to make clear the attribution of interpret right at that time
