本研究旨在了解認真性休閒與參與動機、休閒阻礙之關係，本研究以網球活動為例，主要目的在於探討:1.認真性休閒之網球活動參與者的參與動機與面臨的休閒阻礙2.人口統計變數對認真性休閒、參與動機、休閒阻礙的差異性3.參與者的認真性休閒特質與參與動機、休閒阻礙之關係4.參與動機與休閒阻礙對認真性休閒的影響情形。本研究問卷所得資料以單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關分析以及多元逐步迴歸分析等進行統計考驗，獲致結果如下：1.人口統計變數（不同年齡、教育程度、網球球齡以及參與頻率）對認真性休閒、參與動機、休閒阻礙的確有顯著差異存在。2.參與動機與認真性休閒具有顯著相關。「認真性休閒」及其構面與「參與動機」及其構面之間有顯著正相關，表示「參與動機」越強「認真性休閒」感受也越深。認真性休閒與休閒阻礙具有顯著相關，顯示當「認真性休閒」感受越深時，「休閒阻礙」除了「結構阻礙」構面以外，其本身與「個人阻礙」、「人際阻礙」兩構面感受到的阻礙越小。3.參與動機與休閒阻礙對認真性休閒有顯著的影響力，研究發現參與動機大多對認真性休閒有正向影響力，除了成就需求較不影響認真性休閒；休閒阻礙之個人內在阻礙與人際合作阻礙對認真性休閒有負向影響力，而休閒阻礙之結構性阻礙對認真性休閒有正向影響力。 This research aims to understand the relationship between serious leisure, participation motivation and leisure constraints. Using the sport tennis, this research attempts to investigate:1. Player’s participation motivation in this particular serious leisure and the leisure constraints they may face. 2. The difference in population statistics using serious leisure, participation motivation and leisure constraints as variables. 3. Participant’s traits and characteristics in serious leisure, participation motivation and leisure constraints. 4. The influence of participation motivation and leisure constraints on serious leisure. The research results is analyzed and obtained using One-Way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis and the post-activity ratings. The results are as follows:1.Population statistics (Age differences, difference in the level of education, difference in the number of years tennis is played and the difference in the frequency of practice do show a significant amount of influence on serious leisure, participation motivation and leisure constraints.)2. Participation motivation and serious leisure show a significant amount of positive relation. Serious leisure’s structure and that of participation motivation are similar, meaning that the stronger the feeling for participation motivation, the stronger it will be for serious leisure. Serious leisure also shows a high amount of negative relation to leisure constraints; meaning that when the feelings for serious leisure are strong, the feeling for leisure constraints, structure constraints, intrapersonal constraints and interpersonal constraints will be small. 3. Participation motivation and leisure constraint’s influence on serious leisure is shown through the fact that there is a positive influence between participation motivation and serious leisure. Its personal and interpersonal cooperation constraints within leisure constraint show a negative influence on serious leisure and the structural constraints in leisure constraint show a positive influence on serious leisure.
