本文旨在論究章學誠道論思想，並將其道論思想與宋學朱陸、乾嘉戴震進行對照，藉此得知章學誠對於各家論道以及成道方式的看法，從而對其學風有更進一步的認識。章學誠談論的道為人文之道，此人文之道不完全為六經所包括，人文之道隨著歷史漸形漸著，具有能動性、變異性、發展性、客觀性與以時代性。章學誠認為道不離器，求道必須從人倫日用著手。六經為古代政教典章的記載，欲掌握六經乘載的道，必須透過考據的工作；不過，求道只憑考據是不夠的，學者求道還需自立，面對考據的結果還要能夠別識心裁，成一家之言。 The principle of this article is to interpret Zhang Xuecheng’s thinking in Dao and the style of his scholarly research originated from Dao. Zhang Xuecheng indicated Dao can not completely expressed by the Six Classics, it developed by time and became obvious and firm. For presuming Dao, one must start from human ethics as well as daily lives, it is initiative, changeable, expansible, objective, and contemporary. Otherwise, we have to study the Six Classics to find Dao, we should not only study through textual research, but also have to have our own views.
