English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18278/19583 (93%)
造訪人次 : 914537      線上人數 : 861
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/25906


    題名: 電腦軟體應用證照輔助學習系統成效之探討
    其他題名: A Study on The Effect of Passing Software Application License by Computer Aided System
    作者: 施泱坤
    SHIH, YANG-KUN
    貢獻者: 資訊管理學系
    王昌斌
    WANG, CHANG-BIN
    關鍵詞: 電腦輔助教學;技能檢定;線上測驗;電腦軟體應用
    CAI;skills certification;online test;computer software application
    日期: 2017
    上傳時間: 2017-12-08 17:17:55 (UTC+8)
    摘要:   本研究主要目的在探討電腦輔助學習的效益,利用電腦輔助線上測驗來取代傳統紙筆測驗,用實施分組教學實驗,以了解利用電腦線上測驗來幫助學生參加電腦軟體應用丙級技能檢定學科中是否有助益,並可以協助學生提高檢定成績。  本研究以技能檢定中心所公佈的試題為藍本。本教學實驗以準實驗研究法(Quasi-Experimental Research),採不等組前後測(The Nonequivalent Pretest-Posttest Designs),實驗對象將兩班學生分為實驗組與對照組,實驗組採用線上測驗系統,而對照組則採取傳統紙筆測驗。經過八次測驗與統計分析將研究發現歸納成結論如下:一、實驗組電腦線上測驗的學習成效優於控制組紙筆測驗的方式。二、電腦輔助線上測驗與傳統紙筆測驗均可達成基本的教學效果(及格率達60%以上)。三、實驗組與對照組,參加「電腦軟體應用」( Computer Software Application) 丙級學科檢定,實驗組及格比率為82.5%,平均成績69.6分。而對照組,合格比率為62.2%,平均成績64.4分。顯示出電腦輔助教學能夠提升學生技能檢定學科成績。
      The main purpose of this study is to explore the efficiencies of computer-aided Learning system, Appling the on-line test to replace traditional pen and paper test, and using group teaching experiment to figure out whether on-line test would help students in computer software applications C-Level skills test, also help students improve the test results.  This study is based on the examination questions published by the Skill Evaluation Center.The teaching experiment used “the pretest and posttest nonequivalent groups design” in quasi-experimental research. The two classes of students were divided into experimental group and contrast group.The experimental group taking on-line test system, while the contrast group taking traditional paper test .After eight times tests and statistical analysis,The experimental results are as follows: 1.The learning efficiency of the experimental group using online test is better than contrast group using traditional paper test. 2.Both online test and traditional paper test can help achieve the basic teaching goals.(pass rate of more than 60%) 3.The average score of the experimental group in the Level C skills certification for computer software application is 69.6, higher than that of the contrast group,64. 4,The passing rate of the experimental group is 82.5%, also higher than that of the contrast group, 62.2%. The result supports that the experimental group is better than the contrast group.
    顯示於類別:[資訊管理學系] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    105NHU00396018-002.pdf844KbAdobe PDF481檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML228檢視/開啟


    在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋