| 摘要: | 隨著教育改革、教科書開放由民間出版業者編輯後，不同版本教科書於市場上並存，因此教科書的評選變為一項重要的工作。又國中課程的學習安排是以領域為原則，而社會領域又包含歷史、地理、公民三科，分別由三位不同專長之教師授課，因此社會領域教科書的評選複雜度又更高。本研究是探討個案國中社會領域教科書評選指標因素，因教科書的評選本質上是多層次及多準則決策問題，所以決定以層級分析法為本論文的研究方法。 本研究目的是為建構個案國中社會領域教科書之評鑑表，藉由文獻蒐集、專家諮詢問卷，整理國中社會領域教科書評選指標因素，共有四個構面、十六項評估準則，並利用層級分析法，對個案國中社會領域教師進行調查，分析其權重的優先順序，結果發現以「內容屬性」權重0.5235最為重要，其次是「教學屬性」權重0.3464，「發行屬性」、「物理屬性」重要性偏低。 而在十六項評估準則的權重，以「內容難易適中」、「重視學習動機與興趣」、「內容生活化」「使學生學習批判思考」、「內容分量適當」、「能達成教學目標」、「活動設計彈性多元」等七項最為重要，合計超過80％，依據20／80法則，此七項為個案國中社會領域教科書評選的關鍵因素。依據本研究結果，建議個案國中未來社會領域教科書評選，可參考本研究依評估準則之權重所建構的國中社會領域教科書評鑑表。
With the reform of education and the opening of textbooks by private publishers, different versions of textbooks coexist in the market, so the selection of textbooks has become an important task. In addition, the arrangement of the junior high school curriculum is based on the principle of the field. The social studies also includes three sections: history, geography, and citizenship, which are taught by three teachers of different specialties. Therefore, the selection of textbooks in the social studies is more complicated. This study is to explore the index factors for the selection of textbooks in the social studies of the junior high school. Because the selection of textbooks is essentially multi-level and multi-criteria decision-making, it is decided to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process as the research method of this thesis. The purpose of this study is to establish an evaluation form for textbooks in the social studies of the case. Through literature collection and expert consultation questionnaires, the index factors of textbook selection in the social studies of the junior high school are organized. There are four facets and sixteen evaluation criteria for the indicator factors. Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to conduct teacher opinion surveys in the social studies. As a result, it was found that the value of ＂content attribute＂ 0.5235 was the most important, followed by the value of ＂teaching attribute＂ 0.3464, and the ＂issuance attribute＂ and ＂physical attribute＂ were the least important. Among the sixteen evaluation criteria, ＂Difficulty of Content＂, ＂Emphasis on Learning Motivation and Interest＂, ＂Real Life Content＂, ＂Make Students Learn Critical Thinking＂, ＂Appropriate Content Component＂, ＂Achieve Teaching Objectives＂, and ＂Flexible Multi-activity Design＂ are the most important. According to the 20/80 rule, the seven evaluation criteria are a total of 80%. These seven criteria are the key factors in the selection of textbooks in the social studies.According to the results of this study, it is recommended that schools can make assessments of future textbook selection in the social studies based on the results of this study. |
